LEPSUSYWG/04-01.1

LEP2 SUSY Working Group

Combined LEP Selectron/Smuon/Stau Results, 183-208 GeV

ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL Experiments


M.Berggren, A.Favara, B.Clerbaux, G.Ganis, F.Holldorfer, G.Hughes, B.King, T.Marchant, R.McNulty, L.Pape, S.Rosier, A.Taffard, G.Wilson, T.Wyatt,  Lei Xia.


Introduction :

All four LEP experiments have searched for selectrons/smuons/staus in the data taken  at LEP. No signal has been found. Constraints have been derived in the context of the MSSM combining the data taken at energies ranging between 183 and 208 GeV. 

References to individual experiments:


(You can click on the image to get the postscript file.)

Analysis :

Cross sections and branching ratios have been calculated in the framework of the MSSM. The unification of gaugino masses is assumed, leading to the relation M1 = (5/3)tan^2(theta_W) M2, which is important in fixing the masses and field content of the neutralinos. (The neutralinos appear in the decay of the sleptons, and play a major role in the cross section for selectrons via a t-channel diagram.)

In general, the cross section for R-sleptons is smaller than for L-sleptons. As a starting point, the L-sleptons are assumed to be beyond the reach of the experiments. The limits given here apply for R-sleptons only.

Branching ratios for R-slepton -> lepton + chi1 are calculated as a function of M2 (ie, the chi1 mass) for fixed mu and tan(beta). They are typically greater than 95% except for the lightest neutralino masses at which point R-slepton -> lepton + chi2 is kinematicaly allowed (but supressed). The specific parameter choice is  mu = -200 GeV/c^2 and tan(beta) = 1.5, as this is a point at which the limits on neutralinos from chargino and neutralino searches is weakest. It is also a point of relatively small selectron cross section.

Efficiencies, backgrounds, and candidates have been reported by each group in a standard format. All four LEP collaborations provided this information for selectron/smuons/staus. The confidence level is computed using the multichannel likelihood ratio method with the FFT algorithm developped by Hu and Nielsen.
Systematic uncertainities on the efficiency are included using the Cousins and Highland receipe (Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A320, 1992, 331). Backgrounds are subtracted according to the information supplied by each group.


Combined Results from data collected at ECM in the range 183-208 GeV:

the combination of the experiments shows no evidence for an excess of candidates compared to the estimated background; in particular the excess in the stau channel observed in the data collected at energies of 189-202 GeV has not been confirmed in 2000 data. 

The consistency between the expected background and the selected events is demonstrated in the following plots (the estimators for data-bkg compatibility are briefly defined in here):
 
Channel  Candidates /
Total Bkg 
CL(No Excess)/ 
CL(No Deficit) 
Selectron  sel_adlo_184_208_can sel_adlo_184_208_clb
Smuon  smu_adlo_184_208_clb
Stau  sta_adlo_184_208_clb


Constraints from data collected at 183-208 GeV :

The following results have been obtained combining data collected at energies ranging from 183 GeV to 208 GeV :

Channel  x-sect limit 
Observed/Expected 
Exclusion Plots 
Selectron 
ADLO 
Smuon 
ADLO 
Stau 
ADLO 
All-In-One 
ADLO 


Examples of Mass Lower Limits (@ 95% Confidence Level):

Channel  Comment Neutralino Mass  Observed Slepton 
Mass Lower Limit 
Expected Slepton 
Mass Lower Limit 
Selectron  RR coupling 0 GeV 
40 GeV 
99.9 GeV
99.9 GeV
99.3 GeV
99.4 GeV 
Smuon  RR coupling 0 GeV 
40 GeV 
94.9 GeV
96.6 GeV
91.1 GeV
94.6 GeV
Stau  Z decoupled 0 GeV 
40 GeV 
86.6 GeV
92.6 GeV
83.8 GeV
88.5 GeV
  RR coupling 0 GeV 
40 GeV 
86.6 GeV
93.2 GeV
83.8 GeV
89.2 GeV


These are the coordinates of the limit curves on the plots (format: Mslepton  Mneutralino):