| LEPSUSYWG/04-01.1 |
LEP2 SUSY Working Group |
Combined LEP Selectron/Smuon/Stau Results, 183-208 GeV |
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL Experiments |
M.Berggren, A.Favara, B.Clerbaux, G.Ganis, F.Holldorfer, G.Hughes, B.King, T.Marchant, R.McNulty, L.Pape, S.Rosier, A.Taffard, G.Wilson, T.Wyatt, Lei Xia.
Introduction :
All four LEP experiments have searched for selectrons/smuons/staus in the data taken at LEP. No signal has been found. Constraints have been derived in the context of the MSSM combining the data taken at energies ranging between 183 and 208 GeV.
References to individual experiments:
(You can click on the image to get the postscript file.)
Analysis :
Cross sections and branching ratios have been calculated in the framework of the MSSM. The unification of gaugino masses is assumed, leading to the relation M1 = (5/3)tan^2(theta_W) M2, which is important in fixing the masses and field content of the neutralinos. (The neutralinos appear in the decay of the sleptons, and play a major role in the cross section for selectrons via a t-channel diagram.)
In general, the cross section for R-sleptons is smaller than for L-sleptons. As a starting point, the L-sleptons are assumed to be beyond the reach of the experiments. The limits given here apply for R-sleptons only.
Branching ratios for R-slepton -> lepton + chi1 are calculated as a function of M2 (ie, the chi1 mass) for fixed mu and tan(beta). They are typically greater than 95% except for the lightest neutralino masses at which point R-slepton -> lepton + chi2 is kinematicaly allowed (but supressed). The specific parameter choice is mu = -200 GeV/c^2 and tan(beta) = 1.5, as this is a point at which the limits on neutralinos from chargino and neutralino searches is weakest. It is also a point of relatively small selectron cross section.
Efficiencies, backgrounds, and candidates have been
reported by each group in a standard format. All four LEP collaborations
provided this information for selectron/smuons/staus. The confidence level
is computed using the multichannel likelihood ratio method with the FFT
algorithm developped by Hu and Nielsen.
Systematic uncertainities on the efficiency are
included using the Cousins and Highland receipe (Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A320,
1992, 331). Backgrounds are subtracted according to the information supplied
by each group.
Combined Results from data collected at ECM in the range 183-208 GeV:
the combination of the experiments shows no evidence for an excess of candidates compared to the estimated background; in particular the excess in the stau channel observed in the data collected at energies of 189-202 GeV has not been confirmed in 2000 data.
The consistency between the expected background and the selected events
is demonstrated in the following plots (the estimators for data-bkg compatibility
are briefly defined in here):
| Channel | Candidates /
Total Bkg |
CL(No Excess)/
CL(No Deficit) |
| Selectron | ||
| Smuon | ||
| Stau |
Constraints from data collected at 183-208 GeV :
The following results have been obtained combining data collected at energies ranging from 183 GeV to 208 GeV :
| Channel | x-sect limit
Observed/Expected |
Exclusion Plots |
| Selectron
ADLO |
||
| Smuon
ADLO |
||
| Stau
ADLO |
||
| All-In-One
ADLO |
Examples of Mass Lower Limits
(@ 95% Confidence Level):
| Channel | Comment | Neutralino Mass | Observed Slepton
Mass Lower Limit |
Expected Slepton
Mass Lower Limit |
| Selectron | RR coupling | 0 GeV
40 GeV |
99.9 GeV 99.9 GeV |
99.3 GeV 99.4 GeV |
| Smuon | RR coupling | 0 GeV
40 GeV |
94.9 GeV 96.6 GeV |
91.1 GeV 94.6 GeV |
| Stau | Z decoupled | 0 GeV
40 GeV |
86.6 GeV 92.6 GeV |
83.8 GeV 88.5 GeV |
| RR coupling | 0 GeV
40 GeV |
86.6 GeV 93.2 GeV |
83.8 GeV 89.2 GeV |