| LEPSUSYWG/02-04.1 |
LEP2 SUSY Working Group |
Combined LEP Chargino Results, up to 208 GeV |
for low DM |
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL Experiments |
N.de Filippis, K.Desch, G.Grenier, C.Hensel, A.Perrotta, S.Rosier-Lees
Introduction :
All four LEP experiments have searched for chargino in the data taken at centre-of-mass energies up to 208 GeV. No signal has been found, and limits have been derived in the context of the MSSM. The present combination focuses on the region of small mass difference DM = M(Chargino) - M(LSP).
References to individual experiments:
(You can click on the image to get the postscript file.)
Analysis :
Cross sections and branching ratios have been
calculated in the framework of the MSSM.
Two cases were considered:
| Decay length | Cross section Higgsino |
Cross section Gaugino |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The experiments have analyzed the chargino decays into
the following topologies:
Efficiencies, backgrounds, and candidates have been reported by each experiment in a standard format. Separate files were provided for the two physics cases mentioned above, as they have different efficiencies. Backgrounds and candidates are summed over the four experiments and are in agreement with each other. The agreement is quantified by computing the Confidence Levels (CL) for No Excess (CL for obtaining a less background-like result than observed) and for No Deficit (CL for obtaining a more background-like result than observed). No excess is observed in the data, compared to the expectation from background. The final result is obtained with a multichannel analysis based on the likelihood ratio method. Backgrounds are subtracted according to the information supplied by each group.
Combined Results from 208 GeV :
Luminosities accumulated by the experiments in pb-1
are listed in the table:
| ALEPH | DELPHI | L3 | OPAL | |
| 189 GeV | 174.2 | 153.4 | 176.4 | 167.6 |
| 196 GeV | 236.9 | 224.7 | 233.2 | 204.9 |
| 206 GeV | 216.8 | 221.1 | 212.6 | 197.5 |
As the combination of the experiments shows no evidence for an excess of candidates compared to the estimated background, exclusion limits at 95% Confidence Level are presented for the combination of the 208 GeV data.
Degeneracy in the Higgsino region :
The consistency between the expected background and the selected events is demonstrated in the following plots:
| Channel | Candidates | Background | CL(no-excess) | CL(no-deficit) |
| Chargino |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The following results are shown :
| Channel | x-sect limit expected |
x-sect limit obtained |
Mass limit vs DM | Mass limit vs DM (zoom) |
| Chargino ADLO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
For any value of DM, the exclusion limits from the LEP data up to 208 GeV data are:
| Channel | M(obtained) > | M(expected) > |
| Chargino | 92.4 GeV | 92.8 GeV |
Degeneracy in the Gaugino region (large m0) :
The consistency between the expected background and the selected events is demonstrated in the following plots:
| Channel | Candidates | Background | CL(no-excess) | CL(no-deficit) |
| Chargino |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The following results are shown :
| Channel | x-sect limit expected |
x-sect limit obtained |
Mass limit vs DM | Mass limit vs DM (zoom) |
| Chargino ADLO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
For any value of DM, the exclusion limits from the LEP data up to 208 GeV data are:
| Channel | M(obtained) > | M(expected) > |
| Chargino | 91.9 GeV | 91.9 GeV |